Great review with great pics of the Chevy Spark EV

[Jimmy]

one of the better collection of pics I have seen so far of the new Chevy Spark EV

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/first-drives/2013-chevrolet-spark

 

[KeiJidosha]

one of the better collection of pics I have seen so far of the new Chevy Spark EV

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/first-drives/2013-chevrolet-spark

This is a review of the ICE version. No mention of the Spark EV. But it is correct in pointing out the Spark breaks with the US sub-compact tradition of "Cheap". Currently, only about 5% of US car buyers will consider buying a sub-compact size vehicle. The Spark could change that. We will see if Joe Sixpack will give it a second look.

 

[McHale]

one of the better collection of pics I have seen so far of the new Chevy Spark EV

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/first-drives/2013-chevrolet-spark

This is a review of the ICE version. No mention of the Spark EV. But it is correct in pointing out the Spark breaks with the US sub-compact tradition of "Cheap". Currently, only about 5% of US car buyers will consider buying a sub-compact size vehicle. The Spark could change that. We will see if Joe Sixpack will give it a second look.

I can honestly see people who aren't interested in sub-compact size going for Chevy Spark for many reasnos but number one is definitely that Spark does give you a feeling that it's bigger than it's actual size.

And also the incredible efficiency helps too...

 

[Jimmy]

one of the better collection of pics I have seen so far of the new Chevy Spark EV

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/first-drives/2013-chevrolet-spark

This is a review of the ICE version. No mention of the Spark EV. But it is correct in pointing out the Spark breaks with the US sub-compact tradition of "Cheap". Currently, only about 5% of US car buyers will consider buying a sub-compact size vehicle. The Spark could change that. We will see if Joe Sixpack will give it a second look.

Yeah you are right I missed that one, thanks for the correction